May 06, · Argument 2: Paying College Athletes Would Side-Step the Real Problem. Another argument against paying student athletes is that college sports are not professional sports, and treating student athletes like professionals exploits them and takes away the spirit of The main argument for officials, who believe college athletes should be compensated, is that college athletes are employees under federal labor laws (Cooper ). College athletes have been encouraged and told by some that they are entitled to start unions and should negotiate salaries, specifics, and working conditions. The NCAA, as well as the courts, have addressed this issue and In discussions of compensation for college athletes, a point of disagreement has been weather or not college athletes should be paid for their heavy amount of hard work and dedication. Often, business analysts and sports writers argue that college athletes have no time to work and therefore should be paid, while others contend that college [ ]
Essay On College Athletes Getting Paid - Words | Bartleby
The argumentative essay is one of the most frequently assigned types of essays in both high school and college writing-based courses. We'll provide:. The NCAA is the organization that oversees and regulates collegiate athletics. The NCAA is a nonprofit organization that serves as the national governing body for collegiate athletics. Additionally, the NCAA sets the rules for each of their recognized sports to ensure everyone is playing by the same rules. They also change these rules occasionally, which can be pretty controversial!
That means the NCAA sets some pretty strict guidelines about what their athletes can and can't do, paying college athletes debate essay. And of course, right now, college athletes can't be paid for playing their sport. As it stands, NCAA athletes are allowed to receive scholarships that cover their college tuition and related school expenses. But historically, they haven't been allowed to receive additional compensation. That meant athletes couldn't receive direct payment for their participation in sports in any form, including endorsement deals, product sponsorships, or gifts.
You know now that one of the most well-known functions of the NCAA is regulating and limiting the compensation that student-athletes are able to receive. While many people might not question this policy, paying college athletes debate essay, the question of why college athletes should be paid or shouldn't be paid has actually been a hot-button topic for several years.
The issue is frequently debated on sports talk showsin the news mediaand on social media. Most recently, the topic re-emerged in public discourse in the U. because of legislation that was passed by the state of California in In SeptemberCalifornia governor Gavin Newsome signed a law that allowed college athletes in California to strike endorsement deals.
An endorsement deal allows athletes to be paid for endorsing a product, like wearing a specific brand of shoes or appearing in an advertisement for a product. In other words, paying college athletes debate essay, endorsement deals allow athletes to receive compensation from companies and organizations because of their athletic talent.
But why would Governor Newsome go against the NCAA? And the NCAA definitely makes money: each year, the NCAA upwards of a billion dollars in revenue as a result of its student-athlete talent, but the organization bans those same athletes from earning any money for their talent themselves. With the new California law, athletes would be able to book sponsorships and use agents to earn money, if they choose to do so. But after paying college athletes debate essay states introduced similar legislationthe NCAA changed its tune.
In Octoberthe NCAA pledged to pass new regulations when the board voted unanimously to allow student athletes to receive compensation for use of their name, image, and likeness. Everyone from politicians, to sports analysts, paying college athletes debate essay college students are arguing about it.
Let's take a look at the arguments in favor of paying student athletes! Since the argument about whether college athletes should be paid has gotten a lot of public attention, there are some lines of reasoning that are frequently called upon to support the claim that college athletes should be paid.
In this section, we'll look at the three biggest arguments in favor of why college athletes should be paid. We'll also give you some ideas on how you can support these arguments in an argumentative essay. This argument on why college athletes should be paid is probably the one people cite the most. Because student athletes are the ones who generate all this revenue, people in favor of paying college athletes argue they deserve to receive some of it back. Otherwise, t he NCAA and other organizations like media companies, colleges, and universities are exploiting a bunch of talented young people for their own financial gain.
To support this argument in favor of paying college athletes, you should include specific data and revenue numbers that show how much money the NCAA makes and what portion of that actually goes to student athletes. I've you've ever been a college athlete, then you know how hard you have to train in order to compete. It can feel like a part-time job which is why some people believe athletes should be paid for their work!
Their days are often scheduled down to the minute, from early in the morning until late at night. Working paying college athletes debate essay actual job, paying college athletes debate essay. Sports programs can imply that student-athletes should treat their sport like a full-time job as well.
This can be problematic for many student-athletes, who may not have any financial resources to cover their education. Not all NCAA athletes receive full, or even partial, scholarships! While it may not be expressly forbidden for student-athletes to get a part-time job, the pressure to go all-in paying college athletes debate essay your team while still maintaining your eligibility can be tremendous. In addition to being a financial burden, the inability to work a real job as a student-athlete can have consequences for their professional future.
Other college students get internships or other career-specific experience during college—opportunities that student-athletes rarely have time for. When they graduate, proponents of this stance argue, student-athletes are under-experienced and may face challenges with starting a career outside of the sports world. For instance, this Twitter thread includes a range of responses from real student-athletes to an NCAA video portraying a rose-colored interpretation of a day in the life of a student-athlete.
There are those who argue that only the student athletes who are big money-makers for their university and the NCAA should be paid.
The reasoning behind this argument? There are always going to be student-athletes who are more talented and who have more media-magnetizing personalities. Additionally, some sports don't make money for their schools. Many of these sports fall under Title IX, which states that no one can be excluded from participation in a federally-funded program including sports because of their gender or sex.
Unfortunately, many of these programs aren't popular with the publicwhich means they don't make the same revenue as high-dollar sports like football or basketball. To prove this point, you can look at revenue numbers as well. In fact, the team generated less money than they pay for their coaching staff. There are many people who think it's a bad idea to pay college athletes, too. Let's take a look at the opposing arguments. People also have some pretty strong opinions about paying college athletes debate essay college athletes shouldn't be paid.
These arguments can make for a pretty paying college athletes debate essay essay, too! In this section, we'll look at the three biggest arguments against paying college athletes. We'll also talk about how you can support each of these claims in an essay.
On this side of the fence, the most common reason given for why college athletes should not be paid paying college athletes debate essay that they already get paid: they receive free tuition and, in some cases, additional funding to cover their room, board, and miscellaneous educational expenses.
Proponents of this argument state that free tuition and covered educational expenses is compensation enough for student-athletes, paying college athletes debate essay. While this money may not go straight into a college athlete's pocket, it's still a valuable resource.
Evidence for this argument might look at the financial support that student-athletes receive for their education, and compare those numbers to the financial support that non-athlete students receive for their schooling.
You can also cite data that shows the real value of a college tuition at certain schools. This argument works to highlight the ways in which student-athletes are compensated in financial and in non-financial ways during collegepaying college athletes debate essay, essentially arguing that the special treatment they often receive during college combined with their tuition-free ride is all the compensation they have earned, paying college athletes debate essay.
Some people who are against paying athletes believe that compensating athletes will lead to amateur athletes being treated like professionals. Many believe this is unfair and will lead to more exploitation, not less. Another argument against paying student athletes is that college sports are not professional sportsand treating student athletes like professionals exploits them and takes away the spirit of amateurism from college sports. This argument is built on the idea that the current system of college sports is problematic and needs to change, but that paying student-athletes is not the right solution.
Instead, this argument would claim paying college athletes debate essay there is an even better way to fix the corrupt system of NCAA sports than just giving student-athletes a paycheck. should implement a similar model. In short: creating a minor league can ensure athletes who want a career in their sport get paid, while not putting the burden of paying all collegiate athletes on a university. Creating and supporting a true professional minor league would allow the students who want to make money playing sports to do so.
Those interested in playing professionally would be able to pursue this dream through the minor leagues instead, and student athletes could just be student athletes. This argument against paying student athletes takes a stance on the basis of logistics. Essentially, this argument states that while the current system is flawed, paying student athletes is just going to make the system worse. So until someone can prove that paying collegiate athletes will fix the system, it's better to maintain the status quo.
Formulating an argument around this perspective basically involves presenting the different proposals for how to go about paying college athletes, then poking holes in each proposed approach. Such an argument would probably culminate in stating that the challenges to implementing pay for college athletes are reason enough to abandon the idea altogether, paying college athletes debate essay. Here's what we mean. In this type of argument, you might explain the pay-for-play solution, then pose some questions toward the approach that expose its weaknesses, paying college athletes debate essay, such as: Where would the money to pay athletes come from?
How could you pay athletes who play certain sports, but not others? How would you avoid Title IX violations? Because there are no easy answers to these questions, you could argue that paying college athletes would just create more problems for the world of college sports to deal with. Posing these difficult questions may persuade a reader that attempting to pay college athletes would cause too many issues and lead them to agree with the stance that college athletes should not be paid.
There are several steps you can take to write an amazing argumentative essay about the topic! We've broken our advice into five helpful tips that you can use to persuade your readers and ace your assignment. In order to write a logical, well-organized argumentative essay, one of the first things you need to do is plan out a structure for your argument.
This outline does a few things right. First, paying college athletes debate essay, it makes sure you have a strong thesis statement, paying college athletes debate essay. Second, it helps you break your argument down into main points that support your thesis, of course. Lastly, it reminds you that you need to both include evidence and explain your evidence for each of your argumentative points. While you can go off-book once you start drafting if you feel like you need to, having an outline to start with can help you visualize how many argumentative points you have, how much evidence you need, and where you should insert your own commentary throughout your essay.
You can think of a thesis like a backbone: your thesis ties all of your essay parts together so your paper can stand on its own two feet! So what does a good thesis look like? Because the names, image, and talents of college athletes are used for massive financial gain, college athletes should be able to benefit from their athletic career in the same way that their universities do by getting endorsements.
In order to keep college athletics from becoming over-professionalized, compensation for college athletes should be restricted to covering college tuition and related educational expenses.
Your thesis statement gives your argumentative essay direction.
Is Paying Athletes a Social Justice Issue? -- Debate Clip -- Pay College Athletes
, time: 1:37Should College Athletes Be Paid Essay, with Outline - blogger.com
May 06, · Argument 2: Paying College Athletes Would Side-Step the Real Problem. Another argument against paying student athletes is that college sports are not professional sports, and treating student athletes like professionals exploits them and takes away the spirit of The main argument for officials, who believe college athletes should be compensated, is that college athletes are employees under federal labor laws (Cooper ). College athletes have been encouraged and told by some that they are entitled to start unions and should negotiate salaries, specifics, and working conditions. The NCAA, as well as the courts, have addressed this issue and In discussions of compensation for college athletes, a point of disagreement has been weather or not college athletes should be paid for their heavy amount of hard work and dedication. Often, business analysts and sports writers argue that college athletes have no time to work and therefore should be paid, while others contend that college [ ]
No comments:
Post a Comment