People who smoke should pay a health tax because it's super cheap, they're super addictive and the are really bad for your lungs. First off smoking is very cheap and the time i'm writing this a single pack of smokes cost in the US and that makes it so you can slowly kill yourself on the cheap Dec 21, · Smoktg. According to the World Health Organization around million deaths a year are caused by tobacco. Smoking is set to kill million people in and million humans in , with the biggest rise in low-and middle-income countries. An By making smokers pay for health taxes and even raise the taxes if they keep smoking, people are supporting the nonsmokers in human community. Why does it make sense? It would make smokers be responsible and pay for the inconvenience they have caused, for people who are living and working with them that they harm with their smoking
Should Smokers Pay Health Taxes or No? - Term Paper
In: Social Issues. There are approximately one billion smokers because of an extremely addicting substance called nicotine, essay about smokers should pay a health tax, found within each cigarette. Once a person is sucked into the habit of smoking, it will be hard for them to quit. Smoking is a source of great controversy, and most individuals either support it or oppose it.
Those who oppose formed numerous laws that forbid smoking in specific public places like restaurants, bars, parks, and in some cities, even street corners. Individuals against smoking see smoking as slow death that steals years of a person's life. They want to see smoking be banned for these important reasons; they are health and social problems, as well as a financial burden on the government. The other side of the argument is that smoking should not be banned.
They believe that smokers already pay high taxes so why make them suffer even more by taking it away. Other reasons that smoking should not be banned include; clubs and bars would go out of business, smokers would smoke more at home than in public places, and another prohibition could rise up like in the s with the ban on drinking. Smoking is such a hard and dangerous habit to quit and this is why most people want it banned.
Smoking can be dangerous not only for the smoker, but also for those around the smoker. Secondhand smoke is the Abstract Cigarette and Tobacco taxation has been a hot topic for years. Typically, the taxing of this product is accepted as there are health concerns associated with the consumption of tobacco products. The concept of raising cigarette taxes aligns with goals of increasing revenue for local, state and federal governments, and also works to increase the overall public health of the country.
Although the taxation is widely accepted, there are concerns associated with who the taxation effects primarily, how funds are being utilized and issues with meeting budget goals with the earned revenue. This paper addresses each of these topics in an effort to identify the effectiveness of cigarette and tobacco taxation.
The ill effects of tobacco were studied by epidemiologists in long term case studies to assess the increase of lung cancer mortality to smoking. The findings were considered merely casual by Surgeon General Leroy Burney in As a few years passed, the concern between the relationship of smoking and health grew. This led to The American Cancer Society, The American Heart AssociationThe National Tuberculosis Association and the American Public Health Association collaborating together to address a letter to President Kennedy.
In this letter they asked for a call to action on the issue of cigarette smoking. The Kennedy ECONOMICS FOR MANAGERS T3. Individual assignment. You will be required to demonstrate your understanding of economic concepts taught in the unit and relate them to the cases in the articles. This assignment is designed to encourage you to think about the applications of economic concepts learned in this unit to real world scenarios.
Based on the attached Rubric, your assignment will be graded on your use of appropriate economic theory and concepts, clarity of exposition and overall quality of your answers. Answer all questions. Limit the total word count of your assignment to less than 3, words. Depth is encouraged over breadth: that is, essay about smokers should pay a health tax is more important that you demonstrate you understand a concept fully, rather than talk about 3 related concepts only cursorily.
Allocation as Tobacco and Why Sin Taxes Should Be Increased ENG: English Composition II James Welsh March 11, Tobacco and Why Sin Taxes Should Be Increased Tobacco may indeed come in many shapes and forms, but they all pose very high health risk to not only the consumer but also anyone around during consumption.
With the increase of essay about smokers should pay a health tax taxes healthcare will not only be more affordable, but tobacco products will less likely be purchased. Thus cutting the cost that the government pays in medical care for a smoker.
Talylor, The Forms of Tobacco and The Contents While tobacco has many forms they fall into two main categories Smoking Tobacco and Smokeless Tobacco. Connecticut Department of Health, Some people believe that some forms are safer then others, essay about smokers should pay a health tax, the fact remains that there are no safe forms of tobacco and they all pose addiction as well as health problems. Falling under the category of smoking tobacco: Bidis, Cigarettes, Cigars cigarillos and little cigarsElectronic Cigarette, Hookah, Kreteks and Pipes.
Bidis and Kreteks have a higher concentration of nicotine, tar, and carbon monoxide than the conventional cigarette. Centers of Disease Control and Prevention, The Tea Act of ignited the Boston Tea Party and subsequent American Revolution History.
com,para 1 and the ratification of the 18th Amendment Prohibition spawned illegal production and sale of liquors through bootlegging History. com,para 1. There is a vast array of medical conditions that require medical care. Outside of those that may be connected to alcohol and tobacco use, there are also acquired conditions STDs, tuberculosis, etc. For example, according to the Center for Disease Control and Cigarette Taxes: Do They Have An Effect On Reducing The Demand For Them?
By Lenora Walker Virginia College June 02, Cigarette Taxes: Do They Have an Effect on Reducing the Demand for Them? Cigarette taxes may stop some from smoking but in the long run people will find a way to keep smoking. There are some that are quitting for health reasons. In there was a essay about smokers should pay a health tax between 1, essay about smokers should pay a health tax.
If cigarette taxes are earmarked then it can cause problems in funding education, health services, or other programs that will most likely grow over time. Policymakers and advocates should consider if a essay about smokers should pay a health tax tax increase is necessary.
In the Federal tobacco tax would be indexed for inflation. Researchers have found that by increasing the real cigarette price by 10 percent would reduce the number of young-adults smokers by 3.
Increasing the cigarette taxes has had an effect on non-smokers by reducing the second hand exposure. Studies have showed that people of the low socioeconomics look at price more than the general population. With a regressive tax the essay about smokers should pay a health tax is the one who pays the higher percentage through their income taxes. The economic analysis has Should Electronic Cigarettes Be Regulated As Traditional Cigarettes? Recently, there has been a national discourse concerning the extent to which the government should meddle in the regulation and taxation of electronic cigarettes, or e-cigarettes.
Some states are in favor of taxation on these products, but others are not. Anti-smoking advocates push for more restrictions and higher taxes for the product, but many others disagree, arguing that e-cigarettes are a healthy alternative to traditional cigarettes.
As of right now, the Food and Drug Administration has no regulative control over e-cigarettes because they are currently not considered to be medical products. E-cigarettes are battery-powered substitutes which heat up liquid nicotine into a vapor. As such, they do not contain any of the additional hundreds of cancer-causing chemicals or tar that you would get from smoking tobacco-based cigarettes.
The current marketing of the product is to attract current smokers to the product, rather than serve as a medical smoking cessation aide, which would have been under regulatory authority of the FDA. Because of this, they are considered to tobacco products, under the regulatory authority of the bureau of alcohol, firearms, and tobacco.
We do not believe that it would make cigarettes being cited as the main reason for it. The study however does point out that if the prices are increased for a longer period, the demand might in fact be elastic as people would be impacted more by the increase in prices.
The research further suggested that the demand elasticity varies amongst poor and rich countries along with the population demographics. Perucic, In general when the prices are increased or taxes are raised on inelastic products, the beneficiary is often the producer or the government as the tax burden would be on the consumers.
A tax on cigarettes would mean the consumers bearing a greater tax incidence which would in fact discourage them to spend more on tobacco products. Tax-inelastic-demand n. As seen in the graph above, a tax imposition on cigarettes would shift the supply curve on the left with the equilibrium quantity reducing from Q to Q 1.
The inelastic demand would mean that the tax burden is borne by the consumers whereas the producers bear a small fraction of the tax applied. The government while increasing taxes on cigarettes needs to ensure that all relevant substitutes for the Cigarette tax measure may have unintended consequences Matt Evans On the surface, this November's Ballot Measure 44 is simplicity itself.
The measure will increase taxes on cigarettes by 30 cents per pack, as well as on other tobacco products, and the revenue raised will be dedicated to the Oregon Health Plan and tobacco use reduction programs. What could be more straightforward?
However, the measure raises a host of interesting issues that voters should weigh prior to casting their votes. Most important, essay about smokers should pay a health tax, of course, is the core of the measure, its purpose: to raise money for the Oregon Health Plan, essay about smokers should pay a health tax, ostensibly to offset costs the plan incurs from smoking-related illnesses.
State revenue estimators understand that anytime you raise the tax on something, you will get less of it. This is certainly true in the case of Ballot Measure 44 and its effect on cigarette smoking. In fact, the State Legislative Revenue Office estimates that cigarette use will decline about 4.
In a series of four steps over the past 17 years, Oregon has raised the tax on cigarettes from 9 cents per pack to the current 38 cents. Each of these tax increases represented a smaller amount per pack than Measure 44's 30 cents. In every instance, tobacco use has fallen by more than the current projection of 4. In fact, tobacco use fell an average of almost 9 percent--twice the state's estimate--after those four cigarette tax increases and can not give up smoking.
Without holding a cigarette, they will feel uncomfortable like loosing a best friend. They think that smoking is a good leisure activity essay about smokers should pay a health tax somehow can also be good for their health.
However, other people think that smoking should be banned due to its negative effects. Opponents of banning smoking claim that smoking undoubtedly helps them to relax, for some people, it even improve their concentration. Thus, if people never began smoking, the prevalence of those smoking-attributable diseases would decline, and life expectancy would increase.
The medical research also finds that ceasing to smoke improves health.
Should Cigarette Smoking Be Banned? - Free Essay Sample
, time: 5:47Free Essays on Smokers Should Pay A Health Tax - blogger.com
By making smokers pay for health taxes and even raise the taxes if they keep smoking, people are supporting the nonsmokers in human community. Why does it make sense? It would make smokers be responsible and pay for the inconvenience they have caused, for people who are living and working with them that they harm with their smoking People who smoke should pay a health tax because it's super cheap, they're super addictive and the are really bad for your lungs. First off smoking is very cheap and the time i'm writing this a single pack of smokes cost in the US and that makes it so you can slowly kill yourself on the cheap Not long ago, humans believed that smokers should not pay a health tax because the idea of “smoking is just a habit” it went deep into their mind. Until the day they all witnessed cancer took away people’s lives, which was the moment when all the memories and images of smoking throughout her life came up in their head
No comments:
Post a Comment